Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1997 Week 11 Hansard (5 November) . . Page.. 3676 ..
MR MOORE (continuing):
That is why I sought to remove this test that was added to the legislation by the Assembly, on the amendment of Mr Connolly - at very much the last minute, I might add. That is the argument. I think Mr Whitecross is quite correct in saying that, in practical circumstances, in the vast majority of cases it would make no difference; but it does just change that power relationship between the patient and the doctor. The patient says, "I am in pain; I need more pain relief", although the doctor always has the ability to say, "No; I am not prepared to provide that". At least the doctor would be more inclined to listen to the patient. That was the point of the exercise as far as I was concerned.
Question put:
That the clause be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 6 NOES, 11 Mrs Carnell Mr Berry Ms Horodny Mr Corbell Mr Humphries Mr Cornwell Mrs Littlewood Mr Hird Mr Moore Mr Kaine Ms Tucker Ms McRae Mr Osborne Ms Reilly Mr Stefaniak Mr Whitecross Mr WoodQuestion so resolved in the negative.
Clause negatived.
Clause 5
MR BERRY (Leader of the Opposition) (5.35): Mr Speaker, I just indicate that - I have said this on a previous occasion - I will be supporting clauses 5, 6 and 8, for the reasons I have already outlined.
Clause agreed to.
Clause 6 agreed to.
Clause 7 negatived.
Clause 8 agreed to.
Title agreed to.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .