Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1995 Week 11 Hansard (14 December) . . Page.. 3174 ..

YOU WILL SEE THAT THE REPORT ITSELF IS FAR RANGING AND HAS REQUIRED DETAILED EXAMINATION BY A RANGE OF GOVERNMENT AND NON GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. THIS PROCESS HAS BEEN ONGOING THROUGHOUT 1995. THERE HAS BEEN WIDE CONSULTATION AND A NUMBER OF THE GUIDING CRIME PREVENTION PRINCIPLES OF THE REPORT HAVE BEEN PUT INTO EFFECT.

AT THIS POINT IN TIME I AM ABLE TO INDICATE THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE GENERAL THRUST OF THE REPORT.

THE REPORT IS PARTICULARLY VALUABLE IN THAT IT PROVIDES CRIME

PREVENTION DESIGN AND PLANNING PRINCIPLES WHICH CAN BE

APPLIED TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AND TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

THE ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND PUBLIC

PLACES.

THE REPORT MADE A NUMBER OF GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:

. THE REPORT RECOMMENDED THAT THE ACT PLANNING AUTHORITY PURSUE THE STRATEGIES FOR ACTION IN THE PROPOSED ACT COMMUNITY SAFETY POLICIES (SECTION 7 OF THE REPORT) AND THE PROPOSED CIVIC COMMUNITY SAFETY POLICIES (APPENDIX) AND REFER THEM TO OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES WHERE APPROPRIATE.

I CAN ADVISE THE ASSEMBLY THAT ALL A.C.T. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND RELEVANT OTHER AGENCIES INCLUDING THE CIT ANU, UCAN, AND NCPA HAVE BEEN CONSULTED AND THEIR RESPONSES ARE BEING COORDINATED AND EVALUATED. THE A.C.T. PLANNING AUTHORITY WILL MONITOR AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES.

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .