Page 4155 - Week 13 - Thursday, 10 November 1994
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
2
MADAM SPEAKER, THE DISCRIMINATION (AMENDMENT) BILL (NO. 3)
1994 MAKES A TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO THE DISCRIMINATION
ACT. THE AMENDMENT PREVENTS DISCLOSURE OF MATTERS RAISED
IN CONCILIATION IN SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE
DISCRIMINATION ACT.
THE DISCRIMINATION ACT PROVIDES A PROCESS FOR THE
RESOLUTION OF COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION. UNDER THE ACT,
THE DISCRIMINATION COMMISSIONER RECEIVES AND INVESTIGATES
COMPLAINTS, CONCILIATES WHERE APPROPRIATE, AND HOLDS
PUBLIC HEARINGS. FULL APPEAL RIGHTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS
DECISIONS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS
TRIBUNAL.
TO ENSURE THE FLEXIBILITY OF PROCEDURES, THE TERMS OF THE ACT
LEAVE A WIDE DISCRETION FOR THE COMMISSIONER TO DETERMINE
PROCEDURE. IN PRACTICE, INVESTIGATION PRIOR TO HEARINGS AND
ALL CONCILIATION IS CARRIED OUT BY THE COMMISSIONERS
DELEGATES IN THE A.C.T. HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE.
THE COMMISSIONER HAS ENDORSED THE VIEW THAT EFFECTIVE
CONCILIATION REQUIRES ASSURANCES OF CONFIDENTIALITY TO
ENGAGE THE CONFIDENCE OF PARTIES AND TO ENSURE OPENNESS
AND FRANKNESS IN CONCILIATION DISCUSSIONS. AS A RESULT, THE
COMMISSIONERS DELEGATES GIVE UNDERTAKINGS TO PARTIES
THAT CONCILIATION CONFERENCES ARE CONDUCTED ON A
WITHOUT-PREJUDICE BASIS AND ANYTHING SAID IN CONCILIATION
COULD NOT BE USED IN LATER PROCEEDINGS SHOULD
CONCILIATION FAIL.
4155
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .