Page 3275 - Week 11 - Wednesday, 21 September 1994
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
Amendments agreed to.
Bill, as a whole, as amended, agreed to.
Bill, as amended, agreed to.
RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL TENANCIES
Draft Code of Practice and Discussion Paper
Debate resumed from 20 October 1993, on motion by Mr Connolly:
That the Assembly takes note of the papers.
Question resolved in the affirmative.
MAGISTRATES COURT (CIVIL JURISDICTION)
(AMENDMENT) BILL (NO. 2) 1994]
Debate resumed from 23 August 1994, on motion by Mr Connolly:
That this Bill be agreed to in principle.
MR HUMPHRIES (5.20): I have just a short comment, Madam Speaker. I, of course, support the Bill; but I wonder why it is necessary, given that section 7 of the new Commercial and Tenancy Tribunal Bill actually says exactly the same thing. As I said, there is a slight question mark about that; but obviously, since they are essentially the same, we support both.
MR CONNOLLY (Attorney-General and Minister for Health) (5.20), in reply: It was just to make it abundantly clear, so that we did not create a conflict, that we put it in both Bills.
Question resolved in the affirmative.
Bill agreed to in principle.
Leave granted to dispense with the detail stage.
Bill agreed to.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .