Page 2911 - Week 09 - Thursday, 26 August 1993
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
(2) John Hindmarsh ACT Pty Ltd were engaged as Project Management for the design. documentation and construction of the facility. .
The firm was selected after an extensive evaluation of all submissions that their offered service provided the Government with the best value for money.
The selection criteria which- Capital Works used to assess each short listed Project Manager were as follows:
Understanding the task. and brief requirements Capacity to commit the necessary resources by way of an experienced project.team as soon as the Project is to proceed.
Ability to strictly scrutinise design proposals with a view to
meeting budgetary constraints. .
Ability to gain a high performance from consultants and retain
control of design development and documentation on a fast
track program.
Flexibility to respond quickly and effectively to design changes
during design, documentation and construction .
Ability to anticipate construction, cost or programming problems
and to provide high quality, early advice and recommendations
to Capital Works
Ability to-manage industrial relations -
Ability to manage the budget and construction program
Ability to be sensitive to the Clients requirements throughout
the project: .
An attractive but realistic financial offer.
Confirmation of a willingness to, work with the nominated head
consultant. .
(3) Five other firms were invited to provide Project Management
submissions arid all responded. They were not selected because. after
evaluation of their reponses to the selection criteria they were
considered not to give as good value for money. as
John Hindmarsh Pty Ltd.
(4) John Hindmarshs financial offer was the lowest submitted.
(5) $3M. , .
(6) Yes.
(7) No.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .