Page 2846 - Week 09 - Thursday, 26 August 1993
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
CHIEF MINISTER FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY QUESTION
Question No. 875
Economic Development Division - Lunchtime Meetings
MRS CARNELL - Asked the Chief Minister upon notice on 17 August 1993:
In relation to the Economic Development Division within the Chief Ministers
Department -
(1) Why, are a large proportion of Economic Development Division meetings and
committees held during lunch-time rather than during normal business hours.
(2) Is lunch provided to staff in attendance at such meetings.
(3) If so, from which program within the program budgeting division of the Chief
Ministers Department are such lunches paid.
(4) If they are not paid from that program in (3), from where are they paid.
(5) What was the total amount spent on such lunches during the last financial year.
MS FOLLETT - The answer to the members question is as follows:
(1) A large proportion of Economic Development Division meetings are not held
during lunch time. While resources do not permit an accurate count of the
number of meetings involving people from outside the Division, it is estimated that
between 1,200 and 1,500 such meetings would have been held in 1992-93. On 37
occasions in 1992-93, either because it suited the needs of private or community
sector representatives for meetings to be held during lunch time, or because
meetings went for most of the day, a light lunch consisting of sandwiches, cheese;
fruit and fruit juice was provided. In-all cases, these meetings involved people
from the private and/or community sectors. No lunches were provided for
meetings at which only Divisional staff were present. The number of meetings at
which lunch was provided represents less than 3 % of the estimated total number of
meetings.
(2) Lunch is provided to staff attending the meetings referred to above. Lunch is not
provided at staff only meetings which may go through or be held at lunchtime.
(3) The cost is charged against the sub-program which has responsibility for the
function.
(4) N.A.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .