Page 1850 - Week 07 - Tuesday, 15 June 1993
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
Question put:
That the motion (Mr De Domenico's) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 7 NOES, 10
Mrs Carnell Mr Berry
Mr Cornwell Mr Connolly
Mr De Domenico Ms Ellis
Mr Humphries Ms Follett
Mr Kaine Mrs Grassby
Mr Stevenson Mr Lamont
Mr Westende Ms McRae
Mr Moore
Ms Szuty
Mr Wood
Question so resolved in the negative.
Detail Stage
Clauses 1 to 5, by leave, taken together, and agreed to.
Clause 6
MR DE DOMENICO (10.39): Madam Speaker, I ask for leave to move two amendments together.
Leave granted.
MR DE DOMENICO: I move:
Page 4, line 29, proposed new section 5G, after proposed new subsection 5G(5), insert the following subsection:
"(6) An instrument of appointment under paragraph (1)(b) is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 10 of the Subordinate Laws Act 1989.".
Page 7, line 26, proposed new section 5U, after proposed new subsection 5U(4), insert the following subsection:
"(5) An instrument of appointment under subsection (1) is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 10 of the Subordinate Laws Act 1989.".
Madam Speaker, very quickly, what the amendments do is make the instrument of appointment of the board and the chief executive a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 10 of the Subordinate Laws Act 1989. Mr Berry said that the elected representatives will have their say. Mr Berry, if these amendments get through, it is true that the elected representatives of this Assembly will have their say.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .