Page 3021 - Week 11 - Thursday, 22 October 1992
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
MINISTER FOR URBAN SERVICES
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY QUESTION
QUESTION NO. 390
Urban Services - Uniforms, Footwear and
Jackets Contracts
Mr Cornwell - asked the Minister for Urban Services:
Regarding contracts gazetted in ACT Gazette No. 40, 7 October 1992, in this batch of gazettal notices there are contracts covering $64,631.10 worth of uniforms, footwear and jackets (contracts 705335-9, 705627-7, 705628-5, 705629-3, 705630-6, 705631-4 and 705950-7)
(1) Who are these uniforms provided for (ie what type of activities necessitate provision of uniforms, particularly other than corporate uniforms).
(2) What type of uniforms were purchased from Eurotune Motor Cycles (contract 705627-7) and who will use them.
(3) What type of uniforms were purchased from Canberra Unit Boilers (contract 705630-6) and who will use them.
(4) Is footwear supplied on an annual basis, or needs basis with a minimum time limit for re-issue (contract 705628-5).
(5) For whom are the $5,000 worth of leather jackets and how many were purchased (contract 705631-4).
(6) For whom are the $5,000 worth of eagle jackets and how many were purchased (contract 705629-3).
(7) Since the use was instigated of the motorcycle driver testing area at Phillip, is there a necessity for the provision of specialised motorcycle safety clothing for Registry officers.
(8) When the more expensive items of uniform or safety clothing are issued, do they immediately become the property of the officer. Is the officer responsible for upkeep. If the officer leaves the employ of this section of the Department are, for example, the eagle or leather jackets, returned to the Department for the use of the next officer to take over those duties or is the officer permitted to keep those items for personal use.
3021
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .