Page 2493 - Week 09 - Thursday, 17 September 1992
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
MINISTER FOR HEALTH
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY QUESTION
QUESTION 260
Spectacles for Pensioners - Supply Contract
Mrs Carnell - asked the Minister for Health
In relation to a contract with OPSM to supply optical-wear for Health Care Card holders (ie. pensioners).
(1) Is there any particular reason why a contract should be signed with one _ .
particular supplier of optical wear.
(2) Has OPSM contracted to supply spectacles at discounted prices.
(3) When the contract with OPSM finishes, could the system be restructured so that
a pensioner receiving a voucher for optical equipment from ACT Health had a
range of optometrists to choose from; if not , why not.
Mr Berry - the answer to Mrs Carnells question is as follows:
(1) No, however under the tendering and contract process better value for money is
usually obtained from a sole supplier.
(2) Yes.
(3) It would be possible, however a separate administrative structure would have to
be set up to oversee such as arrangement, and it may not be possible to get such
discounted prices from a larger range of suppliers. The increased administrative
costs plus the probable increase in the cost of spectacles would far outweigh any
advantage to the consumer that would be provided from one supplier with
outlets ACT wide.
2493
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .