Page 6384 - Week 19 - Tuesday, 17 December 1991

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

---

DEVELOPER WITHOUT DOING AN ACT WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE TERRITORY PLAN, ANY OTHER ACTIONS ON THE PART OF THE TERRITORY OR AN AUTHORITY, SUCH AS THE GRANT OF A LEASE OR LICENCE IS DEPENDENT ON THE EVENTUAL VARIATION OF THE TERRITORY PLAN. FOR A CLEAR STATEMENT OF THE CONDITIONS APPLYING TO DESIGNATION, I REFER MEMBERS TO SECTION 127A OF THE AMENDED ACT WHICH PROTECTS THE TERRITORY PLAN AGAINST THE TYPE OF CIRCUMVENTION ABOUT WHICH MR JENSEN APPEARS CONCERNED.

5. DEALING WITH THE REMAINING PARTS OF MR BENSONS QUESTION, SECTION 65 IS NOT WITHIN A DESIGNATED AREA, AND THERE IS NOTHING IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL PLAN PREVENTING THE A.C.T. GOVERNMENT FROM LOCATING A CASINO ON LAND UNDER ITS OWN CONTROL. THE DRAFT VARIATION TO THE TERRITORY PLAN PUBLISHED ON 14 DECEMBER 1991 IS SUBJECT TO THE USUAL PROCESS OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE INTERIM PLANNING ACT AND THERE IS NO ATTEMPT TO CIRCUMVENT THIS PROCESS AS SUGGESTED BY MR

JENSEN.

---

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .