Page 5641 - Week 17 - Thursday, 5 December 1991
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
MR DEPUTY SPEAKER: I think you can, Mr Jensen, yes.
MR JENSEN: I seek leave to amend my amendment.
Leave granted.
MR JENSEN: I move:
Omit proposed new subclauses (10A) and (10B).
Amendment agreed to.
Amendment, as amended, agreed to.
Mr Moore: I raise a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. Having agreed to Mr Jensen's amendment to his amendment, I believe that we should then have voted on the amendment. My understanding is that you did not do that.
MR DEPUTY SPEAKER: I did. I said that the question was that Mr Jensen's amendment No. 82, as amended, be agreed to.
Mr Moore: We had not agreed to the amendment first.
MR DEPUTY SPEAKER: We did that.
Mr Moore: As long as we have, okay.
Amendment (by Mr Jensen, by leave) negatived:
Page 77, line 36, subclause 164(11), omit all words after "by", substitute "the Executive".
Clause, as amended, agreed to.
Clauses 165 to 167, by leave, taken together, and agreed to.
Clause 168
MR JENSEN (12.32): I move:
Page 80, line 2, paragraph 168(2)(b), after "171", insert "where the lease is granted for an amount that is appropriate having regard to the public interest".
Once again we believe that this is appropriate where we are talking about special leases.
MR WOOD (Minister for Education and the Arts and Minister for the Environment, Land and Planning) (12.32): The Government opposes this amendment. It is one that we do not see having any value. Someone wants to determine what is in the public interest. I do not know whether that is encompassed in the definitions or not, but it does not really add anything to it. It is implicit right through
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .