Page 5486 - Week 17 - Wednesday, 4 December 1991
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
MR SPEAKER: The question is: That clause 2 be agreed to. Those of that opinion say Aye; of the contrary, No. I think the Ayes have it.
Mr Collaery: The Noes have it.
MR SPEAKER: Call a vote. Once again, members, I draw your attention to the fact that there is no amendment. When somebody is opposing a clause and there is no amendment, we go straight to the clause. There has been some confusion; so I will go back over this again. We are voting on clause 2. Mr Moore has spoken against clause 2, but no amendment was moved by him. So, we are voting for or against clause 2.
Question put:
That the clause be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 0 NOES, 17
Mr Berry
Mr Collaery
Mr Connolly
Mr Duby
Ms Follett
Mrs Grassby
Mr Humphries
Mr Jensen
Mr Kaine
Dr Kinloch
Ms Maher
Mr Moore
Mrs Nolan
Mr Prowse
Mr Stefaniak
Mr Stevenson
Mr Wood
Question so resolved in the negative.
Clause 3
MR MOORE (11.15), by leave: I move:
Page 2, line 1, omit the definition of "Board".
Page 2, line 13, omit the definition of "determined fee".
Page 2, line 20, omit the definition of "licence".
Page 2, line 21, omit the definition of "licensed premises".
Page 2, line 23, omit the definition of "licensee".
Page 2, line 24, omit the definition of "member".
Page 3, line 3, omit the definition of "Tribunal".
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .