Page 5150 - Week 16 - Wednesday, 27 November 1991
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
MR STEVENSON: I have not mentioned that point before, but I take your point. As for amendment No. 5, I thought that would stand by itself - the substitution of the word "Subsection" for "Paragraph". Yet, once again, supposedly that will not be agreed to. The insertion of "cost and" before the word "feasibility", once again, I think, stands by itself. I think it is unfortunate that members just look at the various things and say, "Oh, we do not agree with any of this". How about we look at it point by point and make a decision as to whether or not we agree?
Question put:
That the amendments (Mr Stevenson's) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 1 NOES, 15
Mr Stevenson Mr Berry
Mr Collaery
Mr Connolly
Mr Duby
Ms Follett
Mrs Grassby
Mr Humphries
Mr Jensen
Mr Kaine
Dr Kinloch
Ms Maher
Mrs Nolan
Mr Prowse
Mr Stefaniak
Mr Wood
Question so resolved in the negative.
Clause agreed to.
Debate (on motion by Mr Berry) adjourned.
INTERIM PLANNING ACT - VARIATIONS TO THE
TERRITORY PLAN
Papers and Reference
MR WOOD (Minister for Education and the Arts and Minister for the Environment, Land and Planning) (7.18): Earlier this week the Assembly passed amendment No. 2 to the Interim Planning Act 1990. With the exception of the changes to sections 22 and 23 of the principal Act, the provisions of this amendment will not come into force until the Act is promulgated in the Gazette. However, in recognition of the spirit of the amendment to section 18 in the Act, I present to the Assembly a copy of the draft variation to the Territory Plan, background papers and
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .