Page 2643 - Week 10 - Tuesday, 13 August 1991

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .


Mr Collaery: Mr Speaker, I withdraw any imputation that Mr Berry is a witness yet. Mr Speaker, the Minister has been rambling on for the last nine minutes on this matter and he has not answered yes or no to a simple question: Did he ask for legal advice or, to his knowledge, did he - - -

Mr Connolly: This is not a cross-examination.

Mr Collaery: It is not a cross-examination yet.

MR SPEAKER: Order! That is not a valid point that you raise. Mr Berry or any Minister can answer the question in the manner they feel is appropriate.

Mr Connolly: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Mr Collaery twice made imputations against Mr Berry. He said, "He is not a witness yet" and then he said, "He is not being cross-examined yet", both of which were imputations that Mr Berry in some way may find himself before a court. I would expect that that imputation would be withdrawn.

MR SPEAKER: Yes, I think there could be a misunderstanding. Please withdraw that.

Mr Collaery: Mr Speaker, may I address the point of order first, before you pass judgment on me, please?

MR SPEAKER: Please proceed, Mr Collaery.

Mr Collaery: Mr Speaker, Mr Connolly makes a fatuous point. I had already said that I withdrew any imputation that Mr Berry was a witness. I had already said that, and the conversation thereafter in this chamber proceeded on a jocular point. If Mr Connolly wishes to make that kind of fatuous point, I submit that you should not ask me to withdraw it. The fact is that the Rally has every intention in this Assembly of pursuing Mr Berry as a witness before the Estimates Committee and any other committee of this Assembly.

MR BERRY: Mr Speaker, do I have a question outstanding? I think I do.

MR SPEAKER: Just before we proceed, Mr Collaery, I would ask you just to withdraw the imputation.

Mr Collaery: Mr Speaker, I repeat my earlier withdrawal and I make no imputation against this Minister that he would be a witness in, as Mr Connolly now puts words in my mouth, any criminal or civil proceedings.

MR SPEAKER: Thank you. The imputation has been withdrawn.

MR BERRY: I am being pursued with so much vigour on this question that I am now forced to go to my written response. I mentioned earlier that we were left with a mess. Following my appointment as Minister for Sport, I directed my departmental officials to finalise negotiations with the


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .