Page 59 - Week 01 - Tuesday, 12 February 1991
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
I note the concern of many in the community about the use of fluoride, though I believe that their fears are substantially unwarranted. Nevertheless, their needs have to be considered. We must respect their views and acknowledge that they are not happy with the use of fluoride in the water.
Let me tell you what concerns I have on the health effects of fluoride; and there are few. I have said before that there is evidence of increased mottling as a result of greater fluoride use. I believe, on the evidence that has been presented, that that is substantially a cosmetic effect and very few teeth are damaged as a result, although we have had evidence to that effect. We have also had evidence - and there is data - to suggest that some individuals may experience hypersensitivity to fluoride-containing agents.
I believe that that is a very small number of people, but I think the evidence is beginning to emerge that makes that a matter worthy of greater investigation. Other than those two points, I have no concerns, after the evidence that has come to me, on matters of health as a result of fluoride use. Therefore, I comfortably support the recommendations that have been made.
As I said, I am quite as happy with the recommendation of one part per million and, indeed, I voted for that on one occasion in the committee. Given the on again, off again nature of the handling of fluoride, you may not be surprised to know that the committee at one stage did establish, as a recommendation, to hold fluoride at one part per million. But, as we considered more evidence, that decision was reviewed and I think we made the sensible decision for 0.5 parts per million. I do not think we would have any problem at all with one part per million. It is demonstrably safe and demonstrably effective.
I want to thank Dr Ann Scott and Ms Judith Henderson, who have laboured for a long time in the preparation of this report. It has been no easy task for them. Dr Scott laid down the foundations of the report and Ms Henderson did a marvellous job, in most difficult circumstances, in coming to grips with the report so rapidly when she came into the service of the committee.
I want to thank my colleagues on the committee. It has been a long grind. We frequently disagreed. We frequently agreed. We have always been most serious about this project and committed to the examination we undertook. I think you would agree that it has been hard work. I am pleased to present this report for the consideration of the Assembly.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .