Page 5265 - Week 17 - Thursday, 13 December 1990

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

---

MR SPEAKER: The question is: That clauses 41 to 43 be agreed to. Those of that opinion say Aye; of the contrary, No. I think the Noes have it.

Mr Collaery: The Ayes have it.

Mr Jensen: What is going on?

Mr Berry: We are opposing the amendments.

MR SPEAKER: I did not call the amendments; I called the clauses.

Mr Berry: You are supposed to be calling the amendments, are you not?

MR SPEAKER: It is just opposition to the clauses; it is not an amendment as such.

Mr Moore: On a point of order, Mr Speaker: for clarification, I believe that the house was not quite clear on what was going on there. Would you mind calling that again?

MR SPEAKER: To be quite honest, I think both sides voted the wrong way. I will put it to the assembled members again. The question is: That clauses 41 to 43 be agreed to.

The Assembly voted -

AYES, 6  NOES, 9 

Mr Berry Mr Collaery
Mr Connolly Mr Duby
Ms Follett Mr Humphries
Mrs Grassby Mr Jensen
Mr Moore Mr Kaine
Mr Wood Dr Kinloch
 Mrs Nolan
 Mr Prowse
 Mr Stefaniak

Question so resolved in the negative.

Proposed new clause 43A

MR BERRY (8.40): Mr Speaker, I move the amendment which has been circulated in my name.

Mrs Nolan: We have not seen it.

MR BERRY: Here it is, watch. There is a typographical error there. It should read at the top, "Proposed new clause 43A". The numbers for the following clauses should be 41 and 42.

---

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .