Page 3282 - Week 11 - Thursday, 13 September 1990
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
proposed sub-contractors (in regards to major works) expenditure programme
assessment of how funds were to be obtained to undertake project current workload
on a number of occasions the Directors of R & G Shelley Pty Ltd were interviewed to provide a status report on asset sales (referred to in answer to question 5) and contractual claim negotiations with other clients that were known to be taking place. (10) Yes.
(11) In each case where tenders were awarded to R & G Shelley they satisfied the criteria used to evaluate tenders.
a. The tender price submitted is compared with the cost planners initial estimate for the works and an assessment is made of the tenderers ability to complete the project within his tender price.
b. Tenderers technical, management, physical and financial resources.
c. Current commitments of the contractor including record of performance and ability to perform this particular type of project.
(12) The decision to give R & G Shelley Pty Ltd continuing work
was based on checks, including confirming arrangements made
by them with banks, suppliers and performance reports on
current projects set out in answer to question 9 .
Interviews were also conducted with the Directors of
R & G Shelley Pty Ltd in regards to their financial status.
(13) The only payments made to Shelleys were progress payments. No payments were made to allow the Contractor to set up on site.
(14) No - Specific provisions exist for the contractor to submit on a monthly basis a detailed progress claim of the value of work carried out in accordance with the performance of the contract and incorporated in the works.
The Superintendent determines the value of works carried out and incorporated and issues a progress claim. The progress claim is required to show the gross value of work completed as determined by the Superintendent.
3282
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .