Page 1583 - Week 08 - Wednesday, 27 September 1989
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
Jolimont Centre
(Question No. 27)
Mrs Nolan asked the Minister for Industry, Employment and Education, upon notice, on 23 August 1989:
(1) Did the Jolimont Centre lease contain a clause or an agreement requiring the provision of a tourist facility at the Jolimont Centre.
(2) What was the wording of that clause or agreement.
(3) Is that clause or agreement still valid.
(4) Is that clause or agreement currently being adhered to.
(5) What action can be taken to ensure that that clause or agreement is adhered to in the event that the centre owner abandons the principles of that clause or agreement.
Mr Whalan: My responses are set out below seriatim.
(1) The lease purpose clause allows but does not require the operation of a tourist bureau and associated tourist facilities.
(2) "3(c). To use the premises only for the purpose of a coach terminal tourist bureau premises and associated tourist facilities, banks, restaurants, taverns, entertainment, recreation, retail and offices, car parking and mechanical plant".
(3) Yes.
(4) An inspection indicated that the current use of the premises complies with the purpose clause.
(5) If a lessee uses the premises for an unauthorised purpose the Supreme Court may, by order pursuant to section 9A of the City Area Leases Act 1936, direct the lessee not to use the land for that purpose.
Metal Recycling
(Question No. 28)
Mr Stefaniak asked the Minister for Housing and Urban Services, upon notice, on 23 August 1989:
(1) Was Metal Recyclers NSW an unsuccessful tenderer for ACT Electricity and Water tender No. PC21/89.
(2) Was MG Metals the winning tenderer.
(3) Was the Metal Recyclers' tender better in all except two of the 10 classes of material and also better in the aggregate.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .