Page 567 - Week 04 - Thursday, 29 June 1989
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
I understand that there is no question that the blockage was caused by either system overflow or poor design. I have also been advised that a further problem has been detected and is being rectified in sewerage lines leading to the new work. I understand that this problem has been caused by the roots from trees on the nature strip.
Drug Laws
MR BERRY: On 28 June Mr Moore of the Residents Rally party asked me the following question:
In relation to the recently disclosed though originally covert introduction of drug laws, alleged to be the toughest in Australia, has the Minister taken account of social and medical consequences, such as the increased involvement of organised crime in the ACT, increased theft as addicts attempt to finance their habits, and greater and more dangerous adulteration of drugs of addiction, all of which may result from making drugs more difficult to obtain, thus making the trade in them in the ACT more lucrative?
First of all, Mr Speaker, it is somewhat regrettable that the drugs of dependence ordinance was made before self-government. I am sure that members of this place would have wished to have had the opportunity to have input into that legislation.
The Act has now passed into law, as members know. While there has been criticism of the lack of publicity surrounding the commencement, and in particular in relation to punitive provisions, I am satisfied that there was wide consultation over a long period.
I am informed that, in response to television and print media advertisements early in 1987, over 200 copies of the then draft ordinance were distributed for public comment. Discussions, including a number of public meetings with groups with an interest in legislation - for example, police, drug treatment areas and health professionals affected by the ordinance - were undertaken.
I understand considerable changes were made in response to comments received. The legislation is regarded as a model for the rest of Australia. I feel sure members of this house would agree that this Act will make a significant contribution towards the success of the national campaign against drug abuse.
On the last point that Mr Moore raised in his question, may I say that the link between tough penalties and increased health and social problems is by no means established. However, this is important new legislation, and the Government will be anxious to monitor its impact.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .