Page 3772 - Week 12 - Thursday, 25 November 2021

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video


How many persons were authorised officers under subsection 12A(1) of the Public Health Act 1997 on (a) 1 January 2020, (b) 1 February 2020, (c) 1 March 2020, (d) 1 April 2020, (e) 1 May 2020, (f) 1 June 2020, (g) 1 July 2020, (h) 1 August 2020, (i) 1 September 2020, (j) 1 October 2020, (k) 1 November 2020, (l) 1 December 2020, (m) 1 January 2021, (n) 1 February 2021, (o) 1 March 2021, (p) 1 April 2021, (q) 1 May 2021, (r) 1 June 2021, (s) 1 July 2021, (t) 1 August 2021 and (u) 1 September 2021.

Ms Stephen-Smith: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

Under subsection 12A(1) of the Public Health Act 1997, the following number of persons were authorised as Public Health Officers, as at:

a)

1 January 2020, 162 persons

l)

1 December 2020, 332 persons

b)

1 February 2020, 162 persons

m)

1 January 2021, 332 persons

c)

1 March 2020, 162 persons

n)

1 February 2021, 332 persons

d)

1 April 2020, 180 persons

o)

1 March 2021, 332 persons

e)

1 May 2020, 180 persons

p)

1 April 2021, 323 persons

f)

1 June 2020, 310 persons

q)

1 May 2021, 323 persons

g)

1 July 2020, 310 persons

r)

1 June 2021, 323 persons

h)

1 August 2020, 313 persons

s)

1 July 2021, 375 persons

i)

1 September 2020, 316 persons

t)

1 August 2021, 375 persons

j)

1 October 2020, 330 persons

u)

1 September 2021, 401 persons

k)

1 November 2020, 330 persons

Please note: Public Health Officers are appointed by position number and some positions may be vacant at any given time.

Canberra Health Services—act of grace payments
(Question No 461)

Mrs Jones asked the Minister for Mental Health, upon notice, on 17 September 2021:

(1) In relation to the $50,000 act of grace payment for “advocacy work at the Alexander Maconochie Centre” referred to in the Canberra Health Services 2019-20 Annual Report, what type of person or entity (individual, company, charity etc) provided the advocacy, and for whom did they advocate.

(2) Why was it necessary to provide the $50,000 as an act or grace payment rather than via a contractual arrangement or grant.

Ms Davidson: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) An individual who advocated for the provision of services and supports for detainees of the AMC.

(2) The $50,000 was provided as an act of grace payment due to the special and exceptional circumstances of the advocacy work.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video