Page 2532 - Week 08 - Thursday, 5 August 2021

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video


report is January to March 2021. These reports provide information relevant to many of the Member’s questions.

1. A single application for defined benefits is made by an injured person for defined benefits, rather than separate applications for different types of defined benefits.

Income replacement benefits are payable when a person injured in a motor vehicle accident is unable to work for a period of time due to their injury. Some may experience only a few days off work and so do not seek the benefit. As such, not all defined benefit applications include a component for income replacement benefits.

The table overleaf shows the number of complete applications (where all information is available for an insurer to determine liability) for defined benefits for the month received by an MAI insurer and those applications that had income replacement payments.

Month

Complete applications

Complete applications with income replacement

Feb 20

9

6

Mar 20

23

13

Apr 20

19

10

May 20

26

10

Jun 20

14

4

Jul 20

30

14

Aug 20

39

17

Sept 20

35

16

Oct 20

43

16

Nov 20

47

15

Dec 20

37

16

Jan 21

23

8

Feb 21

41

14

Mar 21

36

11

Apr 21

33

7

May 21

43

3

(June data pending)

Total

498

180

2. It is not possible to provide the information requested in questions 2(b), (c), (d) (e) and (f) as applications are not assessed exclusively on the basis of the income replacement benefit.

3. There have been seven internal reviews of income replacement decisions sought by applicants. It is not possible to provide information on rejections as applications are not assessed exclusively on income replacement benefits as noted above.

4. At internal review for a defined benefits application, where income replacement benefit was identified as the reason for review, six were affirmed and one was set aside and substituted.

5. No decisions relating to the income replacement benefit have been taken to external review by the ACAT.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video